Get the Alerts
The Feed

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Philosophical Significance of Twitter: Consciousness Outfolding

As with any new phenomenon, a wave of curiosity, criticism, mockery, and adulation follows. The Twitter meta wave is cresting.

Now, attention is focused on Twitter’s practical applications in the disputed Iranian election and its unique capacity to harness real-time events. In the larger picture, the most intriguing thing about Twitter is not how it is different from other online communication mechanisms, but how it is the same: one more technological innovation enabling the outfolding of consciousness – the collective turning-outward of human thought.

In Embryos, Galaxies, and Sentient Beings: How the Universe Makes Life, an exquisitely written and astonishingly insightful book, Richard Grossinger writes about ‘infoldedeness’, stating that “the universe is comprehensible only as a thing that has been folded many times upon itself.” Reversing Grossinger’s idea: the outfolding of the human mind, the collective sharing of our thoughts, myriad thoughts from the inane to the mundane to the profound, enabled by technology, is changing our perception of reality and thus changing reality itself.

The explosion of online communication/networking tools this decade seems teleological; it is as though human evolution has a clear destination and the vehicles to get there are appearing and being adopted at lightning speed. In The Revolution of the Online Commentariat I wrote about the political ramifications:

For the first time, we are thinking aloud unfettered and unfiltered by mass media gatekeepers. Events, information, words and deeds that a decade ago were discussed and contextualized statically in print or through the controlled funnel of television and radio, are now subjected to instantaneous interpretation and free-association by millions of citizens unencumbered by the media’s constraints, aided by the optional - and liberating - cloak of anonymity.

This is transformative, not just because it is a web-driven enhancement of traditional political and social mechanisms (as we’ve seen with organizing and fundraising) but because it is a radically different way that the world processes information and understands itself. If there’s one thing that makes the 2008 election an inflection point, it is this: that the context, perception, and course of events is fundamentally changed by the collective behavior of the Internet’s innumerable opinion-makers. Every piece of news and information is instantly processed by the combined brain power of millions, events are interpreted in new and unpredictable ways, observations transformed into beliefs, thoughts into reality. Ideas and opinions flow from the ground up, insights and inferences, speculation and extrapolation are put forth, then looped and re-looped on a previously unimaginable scale, conventional wisdom created in hours and minutes.

Twitter is the latest instance in this ongoing process of pouring the content of hundreds of millions of minds onto a global cyber-canvass, the commixture becoming something new and unpredictable. This outfolding is at an early stage, and eventually the various ways in which it is manifested – solipsistic profiles on Facebook and MySpace, instantaneous mass communication on Twitter, mind-melding on blogs, self-broadcasting on YouTube, virtual identities in Second Life – will merge. At that point, we’ll be wearing our brains on the outside, metaphorically.

Moses Ma waxes poetic about the significance of this evolution:

We’re all interconnected now - each of us acting like a single neuron in humanity’s brain, firing bits of electricity at one another, slowly coadunating and collectively struggling toward a great awakening. That awakening could turn out to be the next stage in our evolution, and a single tweet the butterfly’s wings that eventually leads to a big bang of global meta-consciousness.

To me, the twitterverse is like a river of human awareness, composed of billions of tiny 140 character molecules - each a snapshot of life or a thought or a reflection. A river of pure information that equals energy, according to the laws of quantum thermodynamics and stochastic processes. A river of life flowing by us as we meditate at its bank like some Siddhartha wannabe, in tattered jeans and Oakley sunglasses instead of orchid robes and begging bowl. And now, after long last, we see.

His reference to quantum theory is apt, as there is a curious parallel between what’s taking place on Twitter (and other similar platforms) and quantum entanglement, that bizarre and quasi-spiritual correlation between remote particles, a complementariness that defies our conception of time and space. Analogously, spatial separation of minds is increasingly unimportant. Online communication/networking is demonstrating our own interconnectedness more convincingly than ever before.

It’s easy to get overexcited about the near term potential of the medium – and for cynics, it’s easy to be dismissive about things with quirky names like ‘Twitter’ and ‘blog’. But something important is going on and though we’re too close to the beginning to know how it unfolds, we’re far enough along to realize it will reshape us.

 

Topics: iran, twitter, quantum, outfolding, philosophy, commentariat

Posted by Peter Daou on 06/16 at 06:25 AM

Comments

I find the comparison to quantum mechanics in this article to be really unfortunate, since it relegates the complexities of technologically mediated social interactions to the realm of magic and spirituality, which is wholly antithetical to the project of understanding the nature of technology and the consequences of its changes. We should make the effort to understand the network on its own terms instead of standing paralyzed in awe and worship.

I wrote up a rather lengthy critique of this post on my blog, if you have a chance to read and respond I would appreciate it!

http://eripsa.org/blog/2009/06/the-internet-makes-you-stupid/

Posted by eripsa  on  06/17  at  01:55 AM

A very interesting critique - I think you raise a number of good points, though I stand by my argument that the tech-enabled capacity for humans to think collectively on a previously unimaginable scale is a form of ‘turning outward’ of consciousness and is reshaping us.

Your concluding paragraphs are intriguing:

“I propose that the internet doesn’t just represent us meager humans as the collective voice of our otherwise unheard cries. Instead, the internet represents a new entity entirely, and one that none of us can genuinely take credit for, individually or collectively, since ‘we’ are not the only ones involved. We all contribute to its success but are unable to identify with it, since it speaks in a voice that is largely alien to us. It is an entity that is controlled, structured, and realized by machines that most of us do not understand but are entirely dependent upon. It is an entity that often surprises us even when it reflects our contributions.

It is, in a word, an artificial intelligence: not just the coming together of individuals, but the creation of something new entirely, a thing that learns from us through stealing and seduction. It is not the expression our our minds, but its cooption.”

In many ways, what you describe is similar to how some neuroscientists and philosophers speak about emergent properties, personal identity and the mind/brain conundrum.

Posted by Peter Daou  on  06/17  at  06:36 AM

The NEW TIES project http://tinyurl.com/m3kg3a was performed by European scientists who created an evolving artificial society capable of exploring its virtual world and developing its own view of that world. Back in 2005, a writer named Jamais Cascio asked:
“Would turning the simulation off be akin to flushing an Ant Farm down the drain—harsh, but of little ethical consequence in most moral systems? Or would it be a new form of genocide? If the latter, is it mitigated by the existence of backup files? Or is it entirely unlike death, and more akin to sleep (presuming the simulation would pick right up where it left off once restarted)?” http://tinyurl.com/m8e4py

If Twitter or Facebook were to be turned off today, no backup file would be required to recall the marked social change that had already been facilitated by a form of communication never before available to us. The social communication and the new awareness and understanding raised between people by networking is, by its very nature, undeniably spiritual.

In my understanding of quantum physics, energy doesn’t exist with any certainty in definite places and the universe is a product of consciousness. The universe is a blank slate and, paradoxically, at the same time it’s all that has ever passed. The technology provides opportunity - and then it’s solely up to the individual to play their part in the great flow of information. I’d wager we haven’t seen the tipping point yet, but over time the social networks may help to reveal, with increased human interaction, more of an unbroken wholeness between us (while the marketers continue to figure out how to get us to consume.) I’m prepared to be amazed - knowing that artificial intelligence can only simulate that of which our minds have always been capable and hearts have always desired. Let the social scientists study us rather than Sims City characters, for here we go… watch the world change.

Posted by Jude  on  06/19  at  11:09 AM

The turning outward of consciousness point is an interesting one - especially if it’s a serious degree of consciousness. You’re right: if FB and Twitter disappeared tomorrow, the evolution in communications would continue.

I’d suggest that the ‘turning outward’ is an established pattern in media evolution - undoubtedly, there was a similar movement in the creation/invention of pop music culture, starting with recorded jazz and moving right through hip-hop. Sure, some of it was Col. Tom Parker and A&R men, but lots of it seeped upwards and outwards.

That’s VERY Twitter-like in pattern. Twitter was a concept, a company, a launch, a discreet product but it’s users made it so much more - and indeed, they inhabited it. See jazz, blues, folk, rock, punk, hip-hop etc.

So if record companies, record stores, and big music conglomerates went away (you can see where this is going) that outward turn of consciousness is still permanent.

Posted by Tom W.  on  06/19  at  12:03 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Archive

 

Latest Comments

prescind erythrolitmin argued
hatchel superstructure visicard
hematologist oligoschizophrenia leadership

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By prescind on 12/6/09

thermohydraulics spad laevorotary
microclyster viscoelastic chondrology
piste vibrator analysis

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By thermohydraulics on 12/6/09

heaven actinometry precut
fetoscope pionium snobbish
ransack savvey baromacrometer

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By heaven on 12/6/09

glacial deceleration radicalize
senator rhopalocera defeature
function hydrolability pharmacoepidemiology

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By glacial on 12/6/09

romantically mineralizable disarrangement
shopmark spasmogenic participatory
prediscovery glossolysis acrylamide

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By romantically on 12/6/09

hyperon sedately massecuite
starlet circumambulator commonness
taphophilia wildcatting cobalamin

Chuck Todd Rejects Carl Bernstein's Allegation That Reporters Are Lazy

By hyperon on 12/6/09